Mate, the idea is more about poking around to find your real feelings, emotions and thoughts, because with trauma, people hide them deep. It is nothing unfamiliar with me to have someone actually get the one little sentence out 6 months after chatting, all of which contains the bulk off thier problems, but they have instead side stepped around it for so long. Trying to find that real hard hitting piece within people is the aim. Solving it then becomes a whole lot easier, whether accepting guilt, or ridding guilt, fault or no fault, it must be resolved.

Correct, and this is one of your current problems. You cannot decide whether you are at fault, or no fault. This is what we are here to work out, and for you to decide. It doesn't matter which choice you take, it is merely about coming to terms with how you honestly feel.

You say you can see the big picture in one breathe, yet cannot ascertain for yourself whether the big picture is right or wrong. Psycologists are telling you that you can't save the world, which you accept as factual, but then you undo yourself by placing doubt in the same context.

So... lets get factual shall we Terry?

• How many people do you makeup? Answer... One (Easy enough)
• In your honest opinion, do you believe you could have saved any severely burned?
• If so, how many?
• If you did decide at the time too attempt to save a severely burned victim, how many that lived because of your actions, would have died instead?