Thread: Maus's Story
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 17-03-2007, 12:43 AM
maus's Avatar
maus maus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 94
maus is on a distinguished road
Default hay bec

Yes I know, different culture and language and timezone :smile:
Thnx for your response
I know the story is totally incomplete but before I can make a story that makes sense it will take a while
I only posted the letter because it was there already and in English, the letter only contained issues that are a violation of human rights not anything else.
The story starts with my mother and her childhood and the consequences for me why I was born and what happened to me after that.
Yes I was abducted when I was approximately 2,5 years old. I am alone ever since.
“Seizure” :smile: I translated that, it means, like I told everyone, that they handle the case as if they “seizure” a car.
“Remove”: there is a new law since 2 years or so that gives authorities the right to abduct children without any evidence. They call it here “preventive abductions”. They can take children away when someone calls them.
In my case it was a malicious neighbour who wanted no people around here and just called, in the hope that I would move away. She now says that it was never here intention that de baby would get hurt in the process. Her actions were solely aimed at me not because of me but because of the house in her vicinity, she threatened the previous owner also who left in time.
Yes there are government agencies that did this.
But the complaint is towards the government of the Netherlands. They have to defend themselves now.
It is the lawyer of the ministry of foreign affairs (state lawyer) who acts on behalf of the government (prime minister, ministers, houses of delegates, house of commons etc). Against me :smile: Me against everybody else.
If the government is convicted it will have repercussions for the judges who did this because they ignored the law for which the government will be convicted. Which is a little bit delicate because the government appoints the judges and the queen has to approve. Because my country is part of the European Union and cannot have laws of their own which are in violation of the laws of the EU or in violation of the laws of the justice department of the EU (or the Human rights court or the UN).
They are prosecuted now for the violation of article 3, 6, 8 and 13. The rest will follow. I have to wait every time for a decision from the Supreme Court before I can prosecute the dutch government and that takes a lot of time since no judge wants to rule anymore in this case. So they postpone and postpone forever.
Complaints against those agencies (CAS) are lawsuits in the Netherlands, they won every one of them, because otherwise the judges made a wrong decision and the judges are covering their tracks they believed all the stories without evidence.
The “preventive abduction law” is considered cruel and inhumane and a form of torture towards the mother and the baby (art.3), art 8 is the law that says that no government may interfere with the private lives of people and their way of life, their opinions, their choices, also the prohibition of taking away peoples houses and property. 6 and 13 is about the unfairness of the trials, being all alone, nobody to help or defend me, and the duration of the trials since every day is vital for the mother and the child. We are not talking impounded cars here. The physicians called the government agency within 2 hours that something was horribly wrong here and that the baby should be returned immediately. That was now 3 years ago because all the perpetrators are covering their tracks and are hoping that I would commit suicide. When I didn’t and went on with the trials they forbid publication in the papers and TV broadcasting.
Reply With Quote