Now I am really confused. I think I need to read the actual report? Perhaps that is a monumental task? Does the Hoge report claim TBI is psycological; or is this the extracted meaning by the editor(psycologist association)? PTSD is still a syndrome, is it not? I thought it was the editor's opinion, that TBI was more psycological (not taken from the report)? Just because the report rules out classic physical trauma(from the impact), does not mean PTSD is not physical. If the editor is a psycologist; this is like asking Phillip Morris whether smoking is dangerous. Psycologists make money, treating the non-physical, manifestation of symtoms. Chemical imbalance(DNA methylation) is a physical dynamic, just as much as outright nerve/cell damage. To me, this just gave more credibility to PTSD being physical; all these physical manifestations(TBI), are now PTSD synromes. Is the report itself too long to post? How can there be no conflict of interest; when this editor(source) treats the symptoms of the extracted conclusion, FOR PROFIT? I presume, the Hoge report might say exactly what this editorial says it does. No telling with the military; but I would like some clarification of actual conclusion by someone other than the psych community, or some Scientologist paradigm. Is there anyone with limited bias, that has read this report?