View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:31 AM
anthony's Avatar
anthony anthony is offline Gender Male
Administrative Editor PTSD
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,430
Blog Entries: 9
anthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud ofanthony has much to be proud of
Default Antipsychotics: Newer is Not Always Better

Schizophrenia patients do as well, or perhaps even better, on older psychiatric drugs compared with newer and far costlier medications, according to a study published yesterday that overturns conventional wisdom about antipsychotic drugs, which cost the United States $10 billion a year.

The results are causing consternation. The researchers who conducted the trial were so certain they would find exactly the opposite that they went back to make sure the research data had not been recorded backward. The study, funded by the British government, is the first to compare treatment results from a broad range of older antipsychotic drugs against results from newer ones.

Yesterday, in an editorial accompanying the British study, the lead researcher in the U.S. trial asked how an entire medical field could have been misled into thinking that the expensive drugs, such as Zyprexa, Risperdal and Seroquel, were much better.

Experts commented that the problem with many drug company studies that seemed to show that new drugs are better is that they focused on short-term results - a symptom or side effect - rather than the big picture: how patients fare long-term.

Source: Psych Central

Last edited by anthony; 09-10-2006 at 10:18 PM.
Reply With Quote