Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lima Tango I've always thought that Ex Service Organisation (ESO's) don't do enough outreach activities but sit back and wait for their clientele to come to them. Result- vets with problems are daunted by this as I guess they need that extra effort to encourage their participation. |
Exactly. The good thing is LT, is that I have never marketed this forum yet, and just so you know, I have 9 years background in online marketing. Interesting ha? Maybe its time that I started ha!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lima Tango The current affairs reporter route is so good and was one I was considering for promotion of the PVA. Coincidentally, I was hijacked by a team of roaming reporters last year wanting a sound bite on the Liberal leadership struggle and Robert Doyle. As I'm a first class show off I obliged. They screened it so the next week I rang the reporter and did my pitch and she was very interested. The PVA have used current affairs programs to good effect as well in the past too. |
I believe this is where the real weight in exposure lay, in that current affairs programs can identify with the issue, the military and those of us who suffer PTSD, and spouses off, and project an actual image of the aftermath of military active service in the veterans.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lima Tango Anyhow. I was considering what to say in an email to her and one concept was to point out that the DVA doesn't recognise the partner as primary carer. They give that title to the LMO's. So the vital job that the partner/carer does is diminished by the Dept in charge. We carers on the other hand do all that we do with little recognition. Sometimes my evil and bitter tongue gets the better of me and I opine,' We provide all the primary care for the vet and sex and all for $94.60 a fortnight'. I think the whole way we look at people who require care has to be changed and all must move from the medical model and be more holistic; it's a TEAM effort and all should be consulted. |
Not sure were your going with that one LT, because when my wife was on maternity leave, she got carers allowance for looking after me from DVA as part of her pension entitlement. Normally she is not entitled to anything because we earn too much money, but when on maternity leave, she generally takes 6 months leave without pay, so that period entitles us to full benefits.
The DVA site fact sheet. Is this something different that you are talking about?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lima Tango As to the problem of getting the young vets to recognise there's a problem, well it goes beyond the individual and can be traced to the culture of the defence forces. |
I think the problem here, is that the military are very good at covering their arse, and they are, because I have seen plenty off it during my 10 years in service. I have even had to do it on certain operations myself... where things just no longer exist for the sake of all. Just look at the most recent, with the soldier who shot himself in Iraq, and its said that he did it whilst cleaning his weapon. My arse... an infantry soldier does not accidentally shoot themselves whilst cleaning their weapon. More like, he took his own life because he could have possibly suffered PTSD, trauma or some effect that if he said something, and possibly did, would be ridiculed beyond belief, punished internally by his own so called mates, just for speaking up about his emotions and problems.
The inquiry... lost from leaving it at the airport! The militar is more than willing to take a little heat for telling people they stuffed up by losing the report or some nonsense, because the attention is short lived, then the media move elsewhere to the newest and more interesting story. The military know this, so they make it look like they give a rats about it, then it goes away, hence so do all charges and documentation of all events. Seen that happen too... even been involved in a little shredding of evidence before under order. The military is very corrupt in those aspects. If something goes wrong, they do their utmost to cover it up, and they have very good people doing that for them in the media departments. Those people are very good at their job. Conspiracy? No... just facts.
I used to see it all the time in Townsville, with drugs, and events a soldier/s got involved in, and the TV would be saying that 10 soldiers have been charged for drug use, when in actual fact it was more like 30 or 40. Hell, I had 10 just in my trade alone at one stage, which was more than what the media where ever told. The cat incident with young soldiers torturing cats... the media had no idea what was really going on inside, because I knew all of those soldiers, some of which had been under my command previously or where in my actual trade... which was a very small one, so everyone knew everyone.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lima Tango Something for a not for profit org could develop in the future.
Which brings me to the formation of aforementioned organisation. What about a STRATEGIC PLAN.
GOALS:- Short term
now to 12 months
-continue to refine the forum to support the partners of vets with PTSD
-mount a publicity drive to bring this forum to the attention of young vets and partners.
Medium Term
up to 5 yrs
-have publicity campaign up and running.
- maintain and grow forum.
- start building organisation
Long Term
10yrs+
Organisation established.
What do you think of this? |
Pretty good, though I would probably like to reduce it my more, as in 10 years time, well... PTSD could be rife, which is way too late.
Because I haven't marketed this site as yet, I figured I would give this a shot first, see how it goes, draw enough interest and hopefully put together a group first.
Year One- Market forum both online and offline
- Raise awareness and support of PTSD through forum, press releases and articles
- Focused support for spouses
- Establish subscription based electronic newsletter
Year Two - Three- Create an Incorporated Association at State level
- [FONT=Arial]Garnish interest from Multi-level corporations for support and donations[/FONT]
- [FONT=Arial]Establish a PTSD support network (spouse morning tea / PTSD morning tea)[/FONT]
- [FONT=Arial]Gap publicity hole that DVA, VVCS, PVA, VVAA, etc have missed[/FONT]
- [FONT=Arial]Garnish support from National newspapers for advertisement[/FONT]
Year Four - Five- Establish Not-For-Profit Company (gives National scale)
- Continue to garnish National donation support
- Fund sufferers and spouses of PTSD within financial difficulty, not covered by other organisations
- Launch National public PTSD initiative
What I do find funny though is
this press release from the minister in regard to funding for DVA, and the billions of dollars used still won't expose the heart of the problem and get help for those suffering, nor their spouses. IMHO, they are looking beyond the problem, over the top as such, as the core of the issue stems much closer to home through National public advertisement and media (TV, Radio, Newspapers)
Quote:
[LEFT]MINISTER OUTLINES MENTAL HEALTH BOOST FOR VETERANS AT NSW RSL CONGRESS [/LEFT]
Increased mental health support and ongoing significant funding for veterans’ health care are critical for a changing veteran demographic, the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs, Bruce Billson, said today at the official opening of the 90th Annual RSL State Congress in Rooty Hill, NSW.
"The Australian Government, through the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, will also continue high level funding for compensation and income support and further recognise the service and sacrifice of our veterans through commemorative activities in the $10.8 billion 2006-07 veterans’ affairs budget," Mr Billson said.
"The veterans’ affairs budget comprised $4.6 billion for health care and rehabilitation, $6.1 billion for compensation and income support and $45.8 million for commemorations programs.
"We have now made the mental health of Australia’s veterans a major priority and provided a further $20 million over four years in this year’s budget to increase mental health spending. This is in addition to more than $130 million currently spent each year on mental health services for veterans. This funding boost will expand access to the range of mental health care services available to veterans and their families.
"The 2006-07 budget will also ensure members of the veteran community continue to receive high-quality nursing services in the comfort of their own homes, with the allocation of $24.4 million over four years for community nursing services."
Other budget initiatives outlined by Mr Billson included:- $4.5 million to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan and Australia’s contribution in the Vietnam War; and
- $10.5 million over four years to commemorate Australia’s contribution in France and Belgium to mark the 90th anniversaries of key battles on the Western Front during World War I.
"The 2006-07 Federal Budget reinforces the Australian Government’s commitment to meeting the changing needs of our veterans and defence force communities, while helping Australians continue to acknowledge the service and sacrifice of those who serve our country," Mr Billson said.
|
And it gets even funnier, because if the below statement is true, then there will be no need for us to even establish a non-profit org to cover the holes that currently exist,
which I doubt will happen:
Quote:
further education and training for health professionals to better understand problems experienced by veterans and serving members;
increasing awareness and education about the importance of mental health and offering enhanced self-help management strategies for those with mental illness;
plans to continue and expand access to counselling services available to the sons and daughters of Vietnam veterans;
an improved outreach program to engage veterans not currently aware of or utilising beneficial veterans support services;
enhanced tertiary support for children of Vietnam veterans through increasing the number of Long Tan Bursaries from 30 $6000 bursaries to 50 $9000 bursaries taken over three years; and
formation of a standing committee to examine research on the intergenerational health impacts on children resulting from a parent’s military service.
|