Quote:
Originally Posted by nie So on Friday we are going to do a nutritional analysis of my system. Anyone hear of such before or tried it? |
hi, nie,
A couple of approaches I've found helpful on this topic are:
1.) Taking a suspect food, say, 'chocolate', 'Coca Cola' or something "processed" that I'm having doubts about, and I purposefully consume it to excess for a short while (both quantity and frequency). That's proven to be a pretty surefire way for me to confirm when that's something to either avoid, or, greatly limit in future. [I suffer from sugar withdrawal anxiety, and used to be addicted to Coca Cola, but even excessive chocolate or cookies would trigger it. At least knowing the likely cause, has been helpful in riding out episodes.]
2.) Ignore the country "Food Guides" if you've the energy to do your own research (in Canada & the U.S., the guides are heavily influenced by the meat, dairy and poultry industries), as "30% calories from (animal) fat" (target) is way, way too high a target level (likely to lead to heart disease unless perhaps your activity level's very high), but that level appeared to be the only way those industries could avoid collapsing from people truly starting to 'eat healthy', imo.
Veggies, whole grains, legumes(beans) rule, and meat, dairy and poultry, if you consume those, should be in moderation is my suggestion, almost classed as 'treats' (less so in children, but, where childhood obesity's out of control, some moderation even there is my recommendation). The usual objection I hear is: "We won't get enough protein!" Well, this is where 'combining' foods prudently enters the picture. For example, a hearty meal of brown rice & beans, because of the way the amino acids from each are digested, provide a complete and useable protein source for our bodies, which we'd not receive if we ate them separately.
If we tried to satisfy our protein requirements by eating them separately, we could do it, but, at an enormous calorie cost as
we'd need to eat way more of each. Plant proteins are 'incomplete' as
individually, plants do not contain the correct ratios of amino acids our bodies need to reform those into animal (human) protein. But, different types of plants have different ratios, and we can take advantage of that, through 'combining'.
A serious side benefit of getting more of your calories from non-flesh sources, is the myriad of vegetation's nutritional components you just don't receive otherwise, along with a generally higher fiber content (= more filling with less calorie cost). In a very real way, aside from their protein content, animal flesh sources of food might well be thought of as 'empty' calories.
Don
ps. Shopping Tip: It's good to have a plan of what you need for good eating
before you walk into a grocery store. I figure you don't want to just walk in and fill your cart with what looks pretty and edible, as that's a form of Russian Roulette that you're too likely to lose playing: there's typically 50,000+ products and perhaps only 200 or so of those are especially healthy (and they're mostly stocked around the perimeter in most North American stores' layouts).